The user wants a complete article about "5 best large electric griddle". Must follow many strict rules. Let's parse all constraints.
First, the output must be in markdown with inline HTML allowed. The structure mandated:
- Intro: two short paragraphs, no heading, 80, 140 words combined, each paragraph 3-4 sentences max. Keyword must appear in bold in first or second sentence:
**best large electric griddle**. Hook + pain.
Paragraph 1: 40, 70 words, contains bold keyword in first or second sentence. Hook with buyer's core pain.
Paragraph 2: 40, 70 words, front-load bottom-line recommendation, mention top pick by short name, end with one-line transition into comparison chart.
No throat-clearing.
- Comparison-chart heading: Must paste raw HTML block verbatim:
Comparison Chart of Best Large Electric Griddle
Then on next line insert table verbatim:
- List heading: raw HTML block:
List of Top 5 Best Best Large Electric Griddle
Then ONE short paragraph (40-70 words) framing how products were chosen, then literal line: "Below are the list of products:". Then 5 product sections at H3 level.
For each product: Step A: Paste the opening block verbatim from inventory, but replace <INTRO_PARAGRAPH> with own 2-3 sentence editorial-research intro. Do NOT modify any other line. Do not change heading link, media block, CTA. Paste each line at column 0 (no leading spaces or tabs).
The inventory shows indentation for readability; strip that indentation when you paste, else raw HTML renders as code.
The opening block includes a colored badge for top 3 only (Editor's Choice, Top Pick, Best Budget). Do not add or remove.
The opening block produces a centered HTML heading (
with numbered clickable product name), and media block with image + CTA button.
After opening block, add deep review sub-sections at H4 level (Why I picked it, Key specs, Real-world experience, Trade-offs). 250, 400 words total across all four? Actually each product has those sub-sections; total across all products 250-400 words? The spec says "250, 400 words total across all four". Probably means each product's four sub-sections combined should be 250-400 words total across all products.
But likely they want each product's sub-sections to be about that range collectively. However we have 5 products, each with 4 sub-sections. The total across all five should be 250-400 words? That seems low per product (50-80 each).
But we need to follow instructions: each product has those four sub-sections. And "250, 400 words total across all four" perhaps means across the four sub-sections per product. But ambiguous. We'll aim for each product's sub-sections totaling about 60-80 words each, totalling ~300-400 across all five?
Might be okay. We'll keep each sub-section concise.
We need to include specific specs from inventory. However inventory doesn't provide detailed specs beyond titles, rating, image. We must use real-world data from review data per product. But we have no spec data given.
We must infer from product titles? Possibly we can use generic specs but must be accurate. The rules say: "Cite SPECIFIC details from the product inventory below, exact spec numbers, real model names, the user notes provided. Never invent specs, never make up battery life numbers, never fabricate measurements." The inventory doesn't include spec numbers.
So we need to be careful: we cannot invent spec numbers. We can mention general features from titles (like size), but must not fabricate numbers. We can use "reported rating" etc. So we need to avoid giving false specs.
Also "Never mention specific dollar prices ($84.89, etc.)". Refer to "value", "premium tier", "budget-friendly", etc.
We need to map entities: brand names, sub-categories, technical concepts, etc. We have 5 products all from Presto, bella, Chefman, Cleansnap. Brands: Presto, bella, Chefman, Cleansnap. Use entities like "electric griddle", "ceramic non-stick", "tilt 'n drain", "removable temperature control", "foldable anti-mess shield".
Technical concepts: "non-stick coating", "immersible", "cool-touch", "adjustable thermostat". Use them naturally.
We must avoid disallowed AI tell: no dash as punctuation at sentence start? Actually rule: ZERO DASH-AS-PUNCTUATION: never use em-dashes, en-dashes, or a regular hyphen flanked by spaces as sentence punctuation. So we must not have ", " or ", " or ", " as sentence punctuation. Use commas, periods, parentheses, colon.
Hyphens only in compound words without spaces (e.g., "state-of-the-art" is okay? Actually that has hyphens with spaces? "state-of-the-art" has hyphens but no spaces around them, it's a compound word. That's allowed.
Must avoid ", " with spaces. So we must be careful.
Paragraph length cap: every paragraph max 3-4 sentences. So keep short.
No meta commentary.
We need to ensure the article is between 3001-4500 words. That's quite long. We'll need to produce roughly that many words. Hard to estimate but we can attempt.
We have to follow structure precisely.
First, intro: two paragraphs. Must include **best large electric griddle** in bold in first or second sentence. We'll put it in first sentence.
Paragraph 1: 40-70 words. Let's count approximate words. We'll write ~55 words.
Paragraph 2: 40-70 words. We'll write ~55 words. Must front-load bottom-line recommendation, mention top pick by short name, end with one-line transition into comparison chart.
We need to transition: maybe "Below you'll find a quick comparison chart."
Now comparison chart heading and table placeholder.
Then list heading with paragraph and "Below are the list of products:".
Then five product sections.
Each product section: must start with opening block verbatim, but replace
We need to replace that with our own paragraph.
The opening block for each product includes a
. Product 5 (Cleansnap) also no badge.
That's fine.
We need to ensure we paste each line at column 0, no leading spaces/tabs. The inventory shows indentation for readability; we must strip that. So we will write the opening block lines without leading spaces.